Hints for “Jughead”
Tomorrow night, “Jughead” arrives, and fans are in store for some big revelations. If you’ve seen the preview videos, you already know a lot about what’s going to happen.
If not, and if you want to go into the episode without any knowledge, I strongly suggest you stop reading now.
As you already know from the preview videos, the castaways were shot at by the Others and they’ve traveled about 50 years ago. To be more precise, we’ll learn they traveled back to about 1954, almost two years before John Locke’s birth.
If you guessed that we’ll also see Richard Alpert, you’re correct. However, he’s not the only familiar face in the past. We will also meet someone else who we have seen in at least one episode in the past. Is it a man or a woman? A relative of Locke’s? Walt?
Desmond will also begin to put some pieces together as he searches for Faraday’s mother. Will he find her, and what will happen when he does? While I won’t answer that question, I will say that suddenly characters who we didn’t think were connected or related will reveal themselves to be very connected to one another.
Also, as shocking as the final moment of the episode is, the real twist that will shock the crap out of you occurs sooner than that.









the suspense is killing me!
I’m biting my nails already…
Comment by Bengelito — January 28, 2009 @ 4:34 am
you guys should be ashamed of yourself by removing docarzt’s name from the interviews he had with cast and crew of lost you are infringing on his intellectual property and you did it in such of away the people can tell Doc wrote them not your fake contributors. If you can’t respect the origins of this site and it’s creator you should remove his work and start fresh instead of pretending that you created it. I hope doc takes legal action because what you are doing is despicable.
Comment by doyousmellcarrots — January 28, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
I agree with doyousmellcarrots. why not do your own stories instead of plagiarzing from the real reporters doing the hard work that you reap?
Comment by Andrew — January 28, 2009 @ 12:33 pm