‘Lost’ Finally Shows Off Its Sci-Fi Roots
J.J. Abrams often creates what I like to think of as "sneak attack sci-fi." His projects tend to have a shell of normalcy on the outside, but the longer you watch them the more you start to realize you’re watching hardcore science fiction. This is one of the reasons he’s so successful and respected. With few exceptions (Star Wars being a huge one), Americans just don’t seem willing to embrace complicated sci-fi. Transformers has about as much science fiction as most people care to handle. This is why I love Abrams’ work — He hides the medicine that people don’t like to take inside tasty candy, and often tricks them into loving genre entertainment.
Most people think that Abrams started smuggling sci-fi onto television with Alias, but his love for the genre even shone through on Felicity. There was one installment filmed entirely in black and white to resemble an old Twilight Zone episode, and the final plot line of the entire series actually hinged on time travel. These digressions didn’t fit in as well on a down to earth show about a girl in college, but they were interesting nonetheless.
Next came Alias, which still remains one of my favorite shows of all time due to its sheer comic book-y wackiness. Much like Lost, Alias started out with a few hints of weirdness, like a strange floating red ball of liquid. However, for the most part it remained a relatively normal kick-ass spy show for at least half a season. With the audience comfortable and settled in, the show then went on to include ancient prophecies, evil clones, red-eyed zombies, brain transplants, people hunting for immortality, and a thousand other impossible things I don’t have time to list. Some people turned against the show as it got more sci-fi, but I completely loved it.
After Alias came Lost, which I’ll get to in a moment, and after that was Cloverfield. Abrams may have only been a producer on the giant monster movie, but it certainly had that element of sneak attack sci-fi. Abrams is a smart enough guy to know that many people would be turned off by a movie about a city smashing monster, so his crew created a brilliant marketing campaign that got both monster lovers and monster haters into the theater. The movie was successful because it had an aura of mystery to it until it was released.
With that epic preamble out of the way, let’s talk about Lost. I’m not giving Abrams much credit for anything that’s happened on the show, mainly because he’s had very little involvement since the first season. However, he did help to develop the concept, and Lost is one of the most successful examples of sneak attack sci-fi that I can think of. It’s certainly my favorite out of his numerous projects, and obviously the one that will have the strongest impact on television history.
For a show that often receives the complaint that "nothing happens," it’s mind boggling to think of how much we’ve learned since Lost’s pilot episode. Like I mentioned with Alias, there were certainly hints of the sci-fi to come, but we definitely weren’t thinking of time travel and frozen donkey wheels back then. There was a polar bear in the jungle, a 16-year-old transmission, and something deadly in the trees. We knew something was weird about the island, but we truly had no idea what we were in for.
The beginning of Lost contained enough strange elements to hook genre fans, but not enough to scare off the sci-fi haters. The show wisely allowed the audience to fall in love with the characters throughout the first season, and slowly (some thought too slowly) started setting up the mysteries of the island. People who normally wouldn’t dream of watching science fiction tuned in to Lost because it was a great character drama, and they became hooked on a genre show without even realizing it.
It’s safe to say that Lost got weirder as it went on, though I’d say that it really started flashing its tasty sci-fi core with Desmond’s time travel story line in season 3. As Lost became more complicated and started to embrace its sci-fi elements, a lot of people tuned out. The show has lost about 3-4 million viewers since season 1, but I’d say that’s to be expected. A lot of people don’t want a show that requires tons of thought, and others just aren’t into anything that involves time traveling bunnies. I can’t blame people for thinking the show’s not their cup of tea, though I can certainly decide not to hang out with them. If you don’t enjoy time traveling bunnies we probably don’t have much in common.
While the first three seasons contained elements of science fiction, I think that season 4 is when Lost became hardcore sci-fi. There’s simply no hiding it now. There are ghosts, people who can talk to ghosts, confirmed time travel, and giant wheels that can move islands. There may not be spaceships and robots, but it’s obvious that nearly anything is possible on this show.
Season 4 of Lost will always be remembered as the year the series pulled back the curtain and showed off its sci-fi roots. Because of that, it’s been a somewhat divisive season among the fan base. Some people think that the show gets more ridiculous as it goes along, while others see the sci-fi as the show’s natural evolution. I’m obviously in the latter camp. I’ve heard some people complain that Lost suddenly became a science fiction show this year, which is just silly to me. It was a science fiction show from the very first episode. It’s simply more obvious now.
As we move into the final two seasons of Lost, I’m certain that the sci-fi is going to become a more central element of the series. There’s no turning back now. Sometime in the next two seasons the mysteries of the island will all be explained, and that’s going to require the sci-fi to move to the forefront. If you’re not a big fan of that particular element of the series, I’d say you’re in for some disappointment. Frozen donkey wheels may seem positively quaint compared to some of the reveals to come.
That’s the problem with sneak attack sci-fi: Even when you hide the science fiction inside a shell of normalcy, a lot of people still reject it once it becomes too apparent. Lost simply isn’t the show for those people. It’s absolutely brilliant science fiction, and after season 4 it’s out, proud, and ready to get even weirder. Bring it on.









Nice article. One thing I thought of: I think that the 8 million viewers that “stopped watching” might be a bit misleading, as DVR technology and subscriptions have boomed in the last few years. Certainly ABC knows this, so whenever I see ratings figures, I usually add another 1-3 million per ep, and smile.
Great site!
Comment by Cory — June 1, 2008 @ 2:13 pm
Tons of people watch through the internet and torrent
Comment by Pedro — June 1, 2008 @ 3:11 pm
I agree with a portion of the drop being attributed to DVR. I haven’t watched Lost live for about 2 seasons now myself. I think many of the hardcore fans DVR the show to go back and watch for new clues they may have missed watching it through the first time.
I also agree with the sneak attack sci-fi effectiveness. My wife loved Alias and has now fallen in love with Lost. If you ever asked her if she likes sci-fi shows her initial reaction would be ‘no way’. The character development and suspense element has her hooked. I love it for the easter eggs and random references that you have to search out on the internet after every episode. In either case she and I watch the show together and have a TV show we both enjoy(a rare occurrence for sure).
Comment by ecedo — June 1, 2008 @ 4:09 pm
good article…I loved Alias as well, but once Lost came around JJ Abrams truly became a genius in my mind.
I love these lost sites (thetailsection,docarzt,darkufo) because I’v realized there are people out there as crazy about Lost as I am. Your like my family.
Comment by steve — June 1, 2008 @ 4:17 pm
I DVR every episode and watch them while recording and at least 2 more times in the week. It’s an illness.
Comment by Jody — June 1, 2008 @ 6:48 pm
My wife is proof that you are right. She got freaked out by the poor dead pilot in the first episode, but by the third or fourth episode, was hooked on the people and their interactions. Now, she and I end each episode (which we do not watch on ABC, but through iTunes out of necessity) and check out the Easter eggs and whatnot. Great article.
Comment by tomfishstory — June 1, 2008 @ 8:44 pm
Normally I don’t comment, but this article was great. It’s a perfect analysis of why Lost is great on so many levels and why it appeals to so many people. I started watching it through the DVDs last summer and it was the moments of the smoke monster, polar bear, and super eerie finale of the Pilot (it’s been on a loop for 16 years!) that had me hooked. I knew there was something special about a show that had the guts to disguise itself as a survivor drama, but at its soul was all about mystery. Thank you for the read.
Comment by Alex Stone — June 2, 2008 @ 12:08 am
I agree with you Don, though i think that one reason lost many viewers is also because they milked the show too much, like everybody does though (just take Battlestar galactica as another example).
Season 3 was a bit full of crap, many friends of mine who loved lost stopped watching in S3. Too many questions and very few answers, i really love Lost and i think it’s one of the best series ever, i’ll continue to watch it and i really liked the turn it had in Season 4 (im not talking about the Sci-Fi path which i also love but the fact that i got more interesting and there was less bullshit) but i was pissed about season 3 as well and i almost stopped watching it.
Comment by suppah — June 2, 2008 @ 2:43 am
Good observations, insights, and writing Don!
If I may, I would like to add my personal experience that many, many people do not watch LOST because of the frequent, nasty portrayals of violence. imho, LOST delivers huge helpings of pain, death, beatings, and even torture … how many times have we’ve seen Ben spitting blood?
For example, my wife watched season 1 and most of season 2, but has since planned to be elsewhere whenever LOST is aired. Neither of my sons or their friends watch LOST. I regularly ask whomever I see including on college campuses, various stores, fun parties, musical/theater events, and most of my friends/families, and few watch LOST because of the nasty violence. Disappointing, and perhaps unnecessary to tell our LOST mystery adventure - RichPundit
Comment by RichPundit — June 2, 2008 @ 4:56 am
Hey guys,
Thanks for all the great comments! My mention that the show has lost about 8 million viewers was probably overstating it. That was comparing the first season finale (an episode more highly rated than average) to the latest finale. In actuality, Lost averaged about 16 million viewers in season 1, and now averages about 12 or 13 million. I’ll update the article to reflect that.
I definitely don’t think it’s just the sci-fi angle that sent people away. There are viewers who watch through DVR, DVD, iTunes, and ABC.com certainly. And I’m sure some people were just frustrated by the pacing and lack of answers in the first couple seasons. Whatever their reasons for dropping Lost, I think they’re currently missing out on the best show on television.
Comment by Don — June 2, 2008 @ 5:52 am
First off, thanks for the great site content! I come here at least 2 to 3 times a week during the season, and once a week during the offseason to keep upon the happenings.
I have DVR’d LOST since the pilot. It’s the only way I watch the shows I enjoy.
I’d be curious to know how many people stream the show on ABC.com. I have friends who don’t have TVs and only watch the show streaming.
Comment by Bob — June 2, 2008 @ 6:20 am
I completely agree with your assessment Don. Add to that the fact that “subtle science fiction” carries more weight than “in your face, aliens attacking you with lasers science fiction” for those of us with half a brain, that appreciate not being force fed a story line on television for once.
Jack Bender has to get a great deal of credit for bringing the writers visions into focus as well. He has done an amazing job directing. For Season 5 however, I hope that the entire production crew including the cast has a chance to go back and re-watch the first few episodes of Lost. Look at Evangeline’s acting in the Pilot episode when she is frightened in the trees. I want to go back to that…I want that kind of grit from the episodes. Things have gotten more and more clean-cut, and I think that the show suffers some for it emotionally.
Comment by Bad_Robot — June 2, 2008 @ 7:22 am
Good article
Here’s my take
The overwhelming majority of the earths population is in the 90 to 110 IQ range. They are content with watching a guy say, “10 miligrams of Morphine STAT !” 80 episodes in a row. They dont mind hearing, “you have the right to remain silent..anything you say…” 6 times a week for the rest of their lives.
They have absolutely no idea that when they watch Law and Order–that they are seeing the exact episode they just watched last week, after it has been thrown into a probability matrix that slighty alters the plot and characters.
They dont seem to notice that every dead body on CSI is a picture perfect female model and the way they solve crimes is completely Sci-fi and absurd. I can see them now– gazing off into space as they watch Dancing with the Stars. Their minds cant expand, they have no imaginations, and they can only tolerate simple everyday conversations. Thats not meant to insult them–its only to counter their insult against us–that Sci-fi is stupid. No…watching the same show over and over again and not even realizing it is stupid. haha
Now, there are plenty of people in the average IQ range that have fantastic imaginations. There are huge exceptions to my premise. But my point is that the TV Ratings are dominated by average people–and average people are boring. I just thank God that the Networks actually allow creative shows on TV because if you go purely by the numbers—crap is what is consumed by the largest amount of people.
Personally, I dont want to see everyday life. I live that. I want to see things that stretch the limits of our imaginations.
http://johnburgerlost.blogspot.com/
Comment by John Burger — June 2, 2008 @ 11:43 am
John, I could not have but it better myself. It’s not an insult or elitist and I might not totally agree with the IQ angel…I have met many a genius without a creative bone in their body who would (and do) turn their noses at science fiction and only live in science fact… . I would say it takes a combination of intelligence, creativity, curiosity, and a intrinsic understanding of what makes a good story. Lost is brilliant on so many levels; it’s fantastic and it’s human, it’s deep yet thrilling. And the article was so spot on, lost wears many faces and appeals to many audiences, my wife watches for the action and to see Swayer shirtless
and I have other reasons…
Let’s hope it sets a new standard in TV writing!
Oh, and to chime in…I’m usually working when Lost is on so I watch on abc.com at 2am california time promptly!
Folly’s Gambit
Comment by follysgambit — June 2, 2008 @ 10:39 pm
I didn’t start watching Lost on TV at all until the second season. I caught part of the Season 1 finale while channel surfing and was interested enough to download all of Season 1 via BitTorrent. I was transfixed and watched the entire season in about 3 days, maybe even less.
When Season 2 started I didn’t have my DVR yet so I had to watch it live at first. I got my DVR from the local cable company somewhere in the first third or so of the season. Without the DVR I wouldn’t be able to keep up.
I try to watch each episode live so that I can participate in the water cooler talk the next day, but sometimes I’m busy or on vacation or just too tired. If I didn’t have the DVR and Lost wasn’t available online I would have to wait for the season to end and get it on DVD, like I did with Alias.
Comment by Eric — June 6, 2008 @ 8:01 am