Your Voice: Comprehensive Theory for the End of ‘Lost’ - Part 1
Submitted by Tailhook
I undertook coming up with an explanation for Adam and Eve, and the answer I came to is one I have not seen elsewhere, so I will propose it here.
First allow me to detail my biases. I’m not a big time loop guy. I don’t like getting bogged down in Casimir effects and cloning and whatever techno-crap they like to wrap their science in. It’s nice fluff, a decent distraction, but it can’t be the root of the story. It certainly gives the writers decent Nerd Cred, but really, the story has to be approachable to the casual viewer. The handwaving has to be kept to a minimum.
Second, I’d like to examine something that often doesn’t get thought through. That’s the Valenzetti equation. What was it meant to show? The definition from Lostpedia says the following: "The equation was secretly commissioned through the UN Security Council and is used to predict the time of human extinction."
So, let’s digress a bit and say you’re an astronomer. You find out that 50,000 years from now, a rock that will kill everyone is going to collide with Earth. Is that likely to get anyone upset? I don’t think so. Now, imagine you find out in 30 years that that same rock will kill everyone. What I’m getting at is that whatever the answer to the Valenzetti equation is, the time of human extinction is going to happen, and it’s going to happen soon. I would even postulate that it is going to happen during this series, and is the main reason they have to get back to the island.
Now, here is an interesting question: has a mass extinction ever happened before? I believe the answer is yes. The purpose of the island, which in my mind is an actual entity that exists outside of the normal space-time continuum in a fold of space, is to examine, and in some cases manipulate, the downfall of man. I believe it draws those people who deserve to be saved, or who can help in this effort, to the island. It cannot change the outcome — we are predestined to kill ourselves — but it can save a small amount of people from that outcome in order to repopulate the planet. To what end? I don’t think we’ll find out. It is what it is.
The next logical question is: how will this extinction happen? I think there is sufficient evidence in the show that it will be by Ice. Something will occur to freeze the entirety of the Earth. This is why polar bears were introduced early on in the show. This is why it was a Polar Station that picked up the signal from the island in “Live Together, Die Alone”. This is also why Hurley, in the mental institution, draws a picture of an igloo. These were all subtle clues to how man will die. By ice. It’s also why there have been plenty of references to Kurt Vonnegut. One of his yet to be mentioned novels, “Cat’s Cradle,” ends with man killing himself through the development of a technology called Ice-Nine.
So, you have the discovery of this island along with a UN Security Council Valenzetti equation that states that the whole world is going to end soon. Whats the next logical step? You need a safe haven. Enter Alvar Hanso, who arrives with a convenient solution. His family discovered an island that can survive the coming extinction. In combination with scientists Karen and Gerald Degroot, they propose a program that will A) examine the technology and effects of the island with the hopes of prolonging man’s extinction, while B) they attempt to build a society on the island that can thrive while the Earth is a big ice cube. That program is The Dharma Initiative.
Now, bear in mind that all of this is part of a manipulation by the island itself. Magnus Hanso and the Black Rock didn’t arrive there by accident. They were drawn there. Desmond didn’t arrive on the island by accident. He was drawn there. And Oceanic Flight 815 didn’t arrive by accident, it was manipulated by the island to crash there. Also, since we now know the island can prevent you from dying, even if you hit a wall at 60 mph, we also know how so many people survived the crash with relatively minor injuries. All of these things are the island’s attempt to draw people there, and help secure good people to restock the planet with once the extinction passes and the Earth heals.
It’s also why the island provides relative immortality, as it will be a good long time before people can go back. It’s also why there is a limitation on child birth. It isn’t the immune system of the mothers that are killing them during pregnancy — it’s the island. It’s a self-defense mechanism against over-population. If on-island conception to birth was allowed in any way, shape, or form, it would inevitably lead to all the resources being overrun and the eventual death of anybody on it, as they have nowhere else to go.
It’s also why Ben is so interested in getting kids who make it to the island. First, they don’t have built-in prejudices and can be taught. Second, they will provide the core of the society that repopulates the Earth. It is also why Ben does not kill indiscriminately. People don’t end up on or at the island too often, and when they do it’s always for a reason. If they are innocent and are willing to mesh with the society and overcome their hangups, they get taken in because they need a healthy population. If they aren’t, they won’t be. This is why he always gets lists of people — to separate the wheat from the chaff. We can already see some people are being drawn to the island, which led the captain to give his big speech while pummeling the guy in "Meet Kevin Johnson."
Check back tomorrow for the remainder of Tailhook’s theory. He’ll explain the purpose of Jacob and the smoke monster, how Charles Widmore ties into everything, and how it all goes back to Adam and Eve. He’ll also lay out his theory for how the remaining two and a half seasons of the show will play out.
————————————–
"Your Voice" is a new TTS series in which Tail Section fans submit their articles, theories or reviews to be published on The Tail Section for all their fellow fans to read. Have you spent far too much time pondering the origins of the DHARMA Initiative? Have you alienated your co-workers by rambling about Daniel Faraday’s wacky time anomaly experiment? If so, we want to hear from you. Send your own Lost theories, reviews, or general thoughts to Editor(at)TheTailSection.com. Please keep all submissions between 300 and 1,000 words. We will read through all submissions and contact you if we publish your entry. You will also receive byline credit on our site.









I’m impressed with this theory! It raises, for me, a question about the title of the show. Perhaps “Lost” refers to everyone else, as in everyone who is not on the island will be lost. Maybe trying to save everyone else is a lost cause.
Also a good point raised is that there are things that will never be explained to us because the explainations will not further the story. The mythology needs to remain mysterious and shrouded. We will probably never get any better explaination for the Island’s ability to manipulate things other than little things like “the island wont let you” or “what the island wants.” At least not an explaination that with any detail.
Comment by Johnny — March 27, 2008 @ 11:36 am
I’ve also wondered if the island might be a kind of Noah’s Ark. Consider the anagram in “One of Us” … Herarat Aviation. That’s an anagram for Earhart, who was an aviatrix (I think one of the skeletons is Amelia Earhart). But it also sounds like Ararat, as in the mountain where Noah’s ark came to rest after the extinction by the flood.
Comment by BobW — March 27, 2008 @ 12:06 pm
normally I just read, and never reply to anything. but this theory sounds really good.. can’t wait to see part 2
Comment by Tobie — March 27, 2008 @ 1:19 pm
This “ark” theory also fits in with the name “Jacob”. In the Bible Jacob was the father the 12 tribes of Israel, the “chosen people”. This fits in with Jacob “choosing” the people he wants to re-populate the earth.
Comment by BobW — March 27, 2008 @ 1:23 pm
I hate you. You spoiled the show for me.
Another few things. This explains the miltitude of backgrounds on the show. Idealy you would want people from all walks of life to repopulate the planet.
Mike: Engineer neccesary for building a new civilization is somone who knows how to build.
Jack: Doctor, duh
Juliet: Another duh, when trying to repopulate the planet it would be best to have someone who could deal with any pregnancy problem.
Kate: Criminal, but highly intelligent
Sawyer: Another highly intelligent criminal, this one comes with the added bonus of being familiar with litterature.
I could go on… but I don’t want to steal our thunder.
But it begs a few questions: If you are unnecessary will you be killed off? Shannon, Anna Lucia, Eko, Karl, Reausseu, Libbi… none have ideal skills for a repopulating party. What role does Widmore play? Why were the others on the island and why did they fight Dharma?
That’s what I got.. hope it hasn’t gone on to long
Comment by Grant — March 27, 2008 @ 1:41 pm
Too far fetched. I do agree the sci-fi time twists are not a means to an end. But I disagree that the human race will be wiped out by ice. The island as an entity is the best question you arise. I can’t begin to explain a land mass chosing destinies for the losties. So I use logic, to understand the writers are stringing us all along. There is a logical meaning to the show, we all just tend to over think and over anaylize. Which leads to your entry. Good job though.
Comment by chris — March 27, 2008 @ 2:25 pm
If the island can stop you from killing yourself… How did Radzinsky manage to?
Comment by Matt — March 27, 2008 @ 4:08 pm
I like this theory. I’ve always suspected that the underlying stakes in the show’s plot are very, very high. I’ve also always suspected that Ben really is a good guy, albeit one who is driven by these high stakes to do extreme things.
Of course this theory doesn’t yet explain who the heck Jacob is. Or the Hostiles. Or the people who built the four-toed statue. But I can see how everything we’ve seen so far could fit in.
Comment by Ed Holden — March 27, 2008 @ 4:33 pm
This theory can be proved wrong by one name,”Aaron”. How could Ben let Aaron leave the island, with extinction on the brink? Then leave the island himself, to start hunting the people that wronged him; who are also off the island?
Comment by Chris — March 27, 2008 @ 5:55 pm
I think if the end of the world is coming, you’re missing connections with the Swan. We know the Valenzetti equation was used to try and change the factors of the end of humanity and therefore prolong it. These numbers were engraved on the station, and had to be entered into a computer in the station every day, and when Desmond asked Kelvin what he was doing when he did this, he told him he was saving the world. What if the Swan was somehow suspending the impending end of humanity (after all we still don’t really have much explanation for the Swan), and with its destruction, the time is suddenly ticking again.
Comment by Devin — March 27, 2008 @ 6:26 pm
Didn’t Ben say Jack wasn’t on the list? So according to this theory, that would mean the island didn’t want him. That is probably why he was able to leave the island.
Comment by Kathy — March 27, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
I like this theory. Looking at the island as as an ark in intriguing, but what about the island as “Eden,” or the “Lost” Garden of Paradise?
Accordingly, “Lost” could be a reference to man’s fall from grace, or those who are not chosen to survive, on the island. Just thinking off the top of my head, but who else, other than HIM, would have the power to influence fate/destiny/etc…
First there was Bruce Almighty, then Evan…now Ben Almighty, or is it Locke’s turn?
Comment by Greg — March 27, 2008 @ 10:00 pm
“If the island can stop you from killing yourself… How did Radzinsky manage to?”
It’s not just that the island won’t let you kill yourself. Michael (and supposedly Jack as well) couldn’t kill himself because, as Tom said, he still had work to do.
I doubt the show is going to explore the Valenzetti Equation. The only reason I’ve even heard of it is because I visit this website and docarzt.com. Millions of other people have never heard of it because they just watch Lost without exploring any of the online material. Besides, isn’t the Valenzetti Equation from The Lost Experience? And didn’t the producers say that The Lost Experience didn’t have anything to do with the show?
Comment by b — March 28, 2008 @ 6:19 am
I am intrigued by your ideas and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. Thank You.
Comment by Bocaj — March 28, 2008 @ 1:01 pm
Where did all the previous posts go, there were more yesterday I swear
Comment by DeGroots — March 29, 2008 @ 2:11 am
@Matt: “If the island can stop you from killing yourself… How did Radzinsky manage to?”
Minor point I wanted to bring up. We, the viewing audience, never actually saw Radzinsky kill himself. We, the viewing audience, took Kelvin Inman’s story of how Radzinsky died at face value. Just food for thought…
@TailHook: Nice theory and I enjoyed reading it. I really liked the point about the island preventing overpopulation via not allowing women who become pregnant on the island to allow the pregnancy to come full term and killing the mother in the process (although the latter seems a bit extreme as the women in their child-bearing years would seem to be an important “ingredient” in the islands recipe for repopulating humanity on the Earth).
Thanks for posting your theory!
Comment by TheZman — March 29, 2008 @ 5:43 am
Was bear in mind supposed to be a pun? It should have been in the paragraph about the bear then…
Comment by bare — March 29, 2008 @ 5:22 pm
This is what I believe as well if you think about it listen to the Bible Verse Eko says in the episode where he burns the plane. He talks about these very things. It’s actually very relevant.
Also for the reason they have to stay on the specific course what if Daniel Fairaday found a way to dome the island to stop the effects. If you look at the comic book you see a society in a dome.
Comment by nomadius — March 31, 2008 @ 3:04 pm
This is quite stupid. You contradict yourself so many times, and the “answers” you try to give us, don’t hold up in any way what so ever. You lack evidence. You lack any solid ideas. It all sounds like you tried to take a bunch of random theories that you thought sounded cool and string them together. Adam and Eve? Come on. Most Lost theories contradict, but this is one of the worst. What are you trying to do, make this show work under religion? Fucking ridiculous. You claim that this show could never be based around science, it has to be “approachable” to the casual viewer. How do you figure? This shows written in such a vague way, that it attracts people solely from curiosity. What happens when it is based on science? What are you gonna do, freak the fuck out? That will be fun. Please refrain from doing this again. No one will figure out what the writers have planned, so just give up.
Comment by lol at religion answering anything — April 10, 2008 @ 7:47 pm