Unanswered Questions: Is ABC Making a Mistake By Airing Half of Season 4?
In my previous "Unanswered Questions" articles, I’ve speculated and theorized over various mysteries that have yet to be answered by the series. However, not all of the questions I have about Lost are regarding the labyrinthine plot of the show. I also have questions about the state of the series itself, especially now that ABC has officially announced plans to bring Lost back for eight episodes beginning on January 31. Is this long-awaited return actually a good thing, or could ABC’s insistence to burn through the completed episodes end up having negative consequences for both the show and the fans?
Let’s take a look at the people affected by Lost’s return to the schedule, and decide whether or not they’ll benefit from this jumping of the gun.
Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse
Will they benefit? No.
It’s no secret that the Lost show runners were against the idea of ABC bringing the series back to the air with only half of season four completed. I find the fact that the network went against their wishes to be a bit appalling, but of course business will always trump art when it comes to these kinds of decisions. Due to ABC’s insistence that the show return, Carlton Cuse had to break the picket line of the writers’ strike to oversee post-production of the final episodes. This whipped up an undeserved, if rather small, storm of controversy regarding his decision.
The only way that airing these eight episodes could possibly benefit Lindelof and Cuse is by giving them a chance to gauge fans’ reactions. They’ve been known to change certain storylines due to passionate pleas from the viewers, such as the whole Nikki and Paulo arc, so if there is anything in this batch of episodes that fans detest, they’d have time to make some changes before finishing the last half of the season. Whether or not this would actually benefit the series or simply placate whiny fans is another matter entirely, but the viewer feedback could be a plus.
ABC
Will they benefit? Of course.
ABC wouldn’t be bringing Lost back to the air so quickly if it wouldn’t benefit them. With the writers’ strike in full swing, and reality TV clogging the airwaves while original programming fades to black, Lost will practically have Thursdays at 9pm all to itself. ABC is pretty much guaranteed massive ratings, especially with all the buzz surrounding the show following the season three finale.
However, one problem the networks often have is that they don’t think long-term. This is why FOX cancels so many up-and-coming shows and replaces them with the reality juggernaut of the moment: they have no patience. Giving viewers a taste of Lost, only to rip it away again indefinitely, could have a dire effect on the health of the series, especially if these eight episodes aren’t universally well received. If viewers are underwhelmed by the eighth episode, which was never intended to be a finale of any sort, will they return when the remainder of season four finally airs? ABC would avoid this issue if they just waited and aired the entire season in one 16-episode run, but that’s not going to happen.
The Casual Lost Fans
Will they benefit? Yes.
It’s hard to believe that there are casual Lost fans out there who don’t obsess over every detail of the series, but I know at least one of them, so I assume more exist. The casual viewer will be happy to see Lost return, and its presence on the air should serve as a good reminder for them that the show still exists. I doubt that they’ll be too devastated when the series disappears after eight episodes, and will probably tune in again for its return. Either that or they’ll just be waiting for the eventual season four DVD set to be released, and this scheduling won’t effect them in the least.
The casual fans have it pretty easy, as they enjoy the show for an hour a week and then manage not to think about it much beyond that. I don’t know how they do it.
The Hardcore Lost Fans
Will they benefit? Yes and No.
Aside from the show runners, the hardcore fans are the people I’m most concerned about, as this is the group that contains myself and anyone reading this article. Of course we’ll benefit somewhat from Lost’s return, because, hello, Lost is returning! At last we get to see more episodes after months of waiting in agony, and finally the horrible cliffhanger we were left with will be resolved. I couldn’t be more excited to see the show come back, and because I’m greedy I definitely want it back right now. After all, haven’t we waited long enough?
However, the return of Lost won’t be all sunbeams and rose petals, no matter how excited we are. If you’ll allow me to indulge in a broad generalization, I’d like to point out that there are two types of hardcore Lost fanatics: the patient types who willingly go on whatever journey the writers would like them to go on, and the impatient types who have a tendency to be very vocal when the show goes on detours or spins its wheels for too long. I think the latter group gets smaller as the series goes on, because many have abandoned the show by this point, but they’re still out there, ready to burst forth with complaints at a moment’s notice.
If you don’t believe this to be true, all you have to do is rewind to 2006 and take a look at how the six episode "pod" that kicked off season three was received. Considering that I’m one of the patient Lost fans who doesn’t mind the occasional detour, I thought the first six episodes were great. Sure, they were limited in focus and didn’t devote time to many of our favorite characters, but it was only six episodes. I couldn’t understand why so many people complained about what, in the grand scheme of the show, was such a small amount of time. Watching six episodes when they’re originally broadcast may take over a month, but on DVD you can blow through those in an afternoon. People were complaining that an afternoon’s worth of television was too slow and not jam-packed with every character ever introduced, and the internet practically exploded with a split in the fandom.
I’m happily spoiler free regarding season four, so I can only assume that the first eight episodes will be ridiculously awesome and please most of the fans. However, some people will still complain from the instant that eighth episode cuts to black. They’ll complain that the first half of the season wasn’t eventful enough, or that a certain character didn’t get enough screen time, or that particular questions weren’t answered, and this will go on for a torturous number of months.
I’m all for discussion of the series, and of course people are allowed to have gripes, but when it’s a show I love as much as Lost, it does grate the nerves after awhile. I also think it hurts the reputation of the show itself. Lost had a lot to prove when it returned after that six episode arc in season three, because critics and many fans had been deriding the show for months. It’s quite possible that, due to ABC’s wonky scheduling, the same thing could happen all over again.
So, do we, the hardcore fans, really benefit from another truncated run of a Lost season? Are you prepared to be given your favorite show on television, only to have it ripped out of your hands a couple of months later? Are you ready for the explosions, complaints, and little flame wars that will no doubt plague the internet between episodes eight and nine? If you’re ready for all of that, then I suppose ABC made the correct decision. As for me, I think I’m sticking with Lindelof and Cuse, wishing that ABC would have done the right thing and waited for all 16 episodes to be completed before airing any of them.
Of course, who am I kidding? I’ll definitely be watching come January 31, and I know I’ll love every single Lost moment that flashes before my eyes. I just think it’s going to be positively heartbreaking when that final episode airs and we don’t know when the show will return to finish its season. Months from now I hope that my predictions are proven wrong, and that ABC’s decision ends up benefitting the series, the network, and, most importantly, the fans.









Well said, Don. You are right about the type of viewers out there, and who will and will not benefit from the show. I just hope this strike settles before the New Year.
Comment by sk8rpro — December 26, 2007 @ 2:17 pm
yes, airing the 8 episodes is the right decision, and i don’t have any second thoughts about it. if they were to hold off showing us a new episode of lost for over a year and a half, people would simply lose interest… even die hard fans. also, if they held off the 8 episodes, and held them off until next year, who knows what kind of crazy schedule would ensue… i think talk was that they would air 24 episodes next season… which would cut off lost at the intended spot for season 5, episode 8… i don’t see how that’s any different than cutting it off at season 4 episode 8… by airing these 8 episodes now, if the strike ends during the spring, they can air the final 8 during next fall, and then get back on schedule… that doesn’t change the original plan. yes, it puts a break in the action, but it wouldn’t change the story. if they aired 24 episodes as ’season 4′ next year (2009), the story would have to change to ‘make it work’, to make episode 8 of season 5 the new season finale of season 4… that would change the story. airing these 8 episodes now, another 8 in the fall, and then season 5 as it should have been, then the story will be unaffected.
another thing… it’s not like abc is ‘ripping the show away’ after 8 episodes. we know that there will only be 8 episodes, and we can prepare for it.
Comment by ackermaniv — December 26, 2007 @ 3:40 pm
I think that your points are only missing one vital subgroup.
Those who don’t watch LOST, through either ignorance, or apathy, may find themselves attracted by a show that is generating a lot of buzz, has NEW episodes airing, and is always extremely well written, directed and acted. This represents a large market for ABC to go for, and the end of the season will only serve to increase the draw that the show already has.
Of course Lost fans will curse the heavens until the rest comes on, but overall this will be much better than worse.
Comment by btattttttttts — December 26, 2007 @ 8:21 pm
What I’m worried about is how DL and CC will react in editing episodes 7 and 8. There was discussion i heard of a more natural break after 6, alluding to the fact that there is a stream of consciousness one could say regarding the plot of each segment in the upcoming season. With this in mind, will there be unnatural editing changes made to the story line of the closing episodes? How concerned are DL and CC about fan’s and casual watchers ability to understand this unnatural break? there have been many episodes in the past that depended on the following episode to make sense. I love a cliff hanger, but not a broken end.
Comment by Austin — December 26, 2007 @ 8:26 pm
Personally, I love it. ABC promised me Lost in February and I am glad they are giving it to me. If I had to wait from May 2007 to September 2008 to any new Lost, I’d probably kill myself.
Comment by Doug — December 26, 2007 @ 9:04 pm
If you think you can wait to watch an uninterrupted Season 4 after the strike ends, I beg you to read the article I link to at the end of my post:
Fact of the matter is, the strike is not ending anytime soon. Attempts have been made to negotiate since talks broke down on Dec 7th (read the article), but, because all TV networks are tiny parts of huge conglomerates, these companies have not lost one cent since the strike began. ONE CENT. Their stocks in Wall street have not moved in eight weeks. They are prepared to hold off for twelve months if they have to. Right now, the writers have no leverage, it is sad but true.
Are you prepared to have a May 2007-February 2009 break without new episodes of Lost? No you are not. That would be bad for Cuse, Lindelof, the casual fan, and the hardcore fan. The show would lose half of its ratings, and lets face it, it is not cheap to produce. It is actually the most expensive Serial on Television today. Would ABC consider changing the 2010 contract if the show lost major ratings?
I don’t even want to think about what would happen if ABC decided to hold those episodes until the strike ended. Damon, Carlton, and us the hardcore fans can take a few people complaining online. I bet even D&C understand it’s not smart to go through 13-14 months without new episodes.
The strike is not ending anytime soon:
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/exclusive-attempt-fails-to-restart-wga-amptp-talks-outlook-very-grim/
Comment by dresan — December 26, 2007 @ 9:54 pm
i’d rather have 8 eps than none…. i cant wait for 1/31/08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! to me its bigger than the Superbowl, and i am a huuuuuuge football fan…. i hope sawyer impregnates the Island!!!
Comment by themachine — December 26, 2007 @ 11:12 pm
While I understand that Darlton wanted the entire season to be shown without breaks, well, the world of TV has changed and will continue to change even more with the strike.
I think that many Lost fans get most of their other shows from cable, not network TV. We’re used to cable shows having insanely long breaks between seasons and short bursts of new episodes followed by long pauses. Cable has been building that environment for years now and fans are not as worked up about this sort of thing as they would have been a few years back. I don’t think the scheduling this year is going to cause any fans to walk away. We all know why it’s happening, and what the original plan was.
Lost is in a great position to attract new viewers, since no other new, scripted shows are around to compete against it. It’s a great time to drag your friends who don’t watch Lost into the fold! Get them as up to speed as you can before the 1/31 premiere. The break may actually help with new viewers. They might be intrigued by the first 8, and then seek out the DVDs to watch the entire catalog once there is no new programming to watch on TV. Then be dying to see the rest of Season 4, whenever it returns!
Comment by KeepingAwake — December 27, 2007 @ 6:47 am
So are we getting eight episodes or 8 hours ? The preview on ABC.com says that the season premier will be two hours.
Comment by Gary — December 27, 2007 @ 9:23 am
@Gary,
The episode itself is not 2 hours. At 8 PM, we get some “special,” then at 9 PM we get the “most anticipated premiere of the year.” Therefore, it is long as any episode (except the finales).
Besides, technically, each episode ranges from 40-43 minutes plus the remainder of it are commercials.
Comment by sk8rpro — December 27, 2007 @ 10:39 am
I am bummed that for now there will only be 8 episodes, but I am happy that Lost is finally coming back even if only for half a season.
Comment by Jen — December 27, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
Get the RSS back on!!
Comment by Please — January 1, 2008 @ 2:18 am