Charlie Dead? I think not.

Lost News — May 13, 2007 at 4:29 pm by docarzt

Right, well, I have absolutely no proof at all that my thoughts from here on in are accurate, but there’s also virtually no proof that I’m wrong either. With next Wednesday being a Charlie episode combined with Desmond’s premonition of his death, the biggest question that should be on our minds is does Charlie die this Wednesday? Most of us have probably written him off, but I’m not so sure. Click on through to hear why and chime in with your own thoughts.

Is Charlie a goner? I don’t think we should write him off just yet. There’s the spoilers from Kristin posted on Spoilerfix.com, and the confirmed deaths from DarkUFO, but there’s been plenty of times when spoilers have proven to be foilers, and I think in this case that they are foilers.

1. It’s too obvious.

In episodes past we’ve seen the LOST writing staff do completely the opposite of what we would expect. When Ben shot Locke, when Juliet turns out not to be a mole, when Jacob seems to be a figment of Ben’s imagination but then something more… That’s just last week’s episode. We’ve been told Charlie is going to die, and we know that main character deaths occur in their flashback episodes, but I think we’ve been mislead here in a very clever way. I think it would be very unLOSTlike to do what we think they will do.

Not only that, it would be so easy to do just that. Instead, especially with the lack of popularity for Charlie (reading the comments over at DarkUFO, people don’t seem to be upset at all about Charlie, rather the other two posted), it would be more interesting if Charlie could redeem himself to us.

2. There’s more to him.

Eko’s death brought this point to mind. After we’ve seen the important parts of a character’s life, they tend to get killed off. Unless there’s something amazing that is going to happen to Charlie this week, I don’t think they’ve even got started telling the more interesting parts of Charlie’s life. We saw the majority of Eko’s life, from killing that child when he was younger, to Yemi’s death, to the priesthood and to Claire’s psychic, we got a pretty good look at it all. He was done. With Charlie on the other hand, we got a twisted childhood dream thing, then a little glance at him playing a horrible version of Wonderwall (which I hear we will pick up from again this week, from a filiming report at DarkUFO), then to his pop career and drug addiciton. I think there’s more left, namely, what’s in between childhood and Wonderwall. Something better than Definitely Maybe, I hope.

3. I like him. So do others.

Hopefully not The Others or else kidnapping might be more in order than murder, but the truth is: I like Charlie. He’s more comic relief for the show that Hurley. I remember a line along the lines of, "It’s French! I’ve never been so glad to hear the French!" Bring more of that back, and some more character development and Charlie will be great again. And I think that’s what’s in store for him.

All in all, I will be disappointed to see Charlie leave. He’s a good character, and like most of our other LOSTies, he just needs more screen time. There’s more to him, and I would expect the writers, given the history of big twists with anticipated events, would be more ‘twisted’ with this event. I think the Charlie problem will get resolved, but not how most of us think.

But, of course, I have no proof.

Which Lost Character Are You?

Exclusive Interviews

Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof LOST
Doc's Exclusive interview with Lost show runners Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof.

Doc Interrogates Benjamin Linus himself!

Doc encounters William Mapother and gets the lowdown on the Ethan Vs. Locke cut scene.

Doc interviews the portrayer of his namesake! Daniel Roebuck!

Doc gets the truth out of Dr. Marvin Candle / Wickmund / Haliwax

Doc finds out what on of Lost's best writers ever is up to.

Doc catches up with TLE's Rachel Blake, Jamie Silberhartz!
Terms Of Use