Kate Crosses The King
Kate Crosses the King
By
Kermet Merl Key
(aka MerlboroMan)
"Go now, there are other worlds then these."
Jake Chambers, The Gunslinger
I am not the first person to suggest that LOST may be dealing with multiple universes or realities. John Terry, better known as Christian Sheppard to LOST fans, suggested to the official LOST Magazine that the Superstring theory, or M-theory, was at the heart of LOST.
I have a theory about the whole island. It is the Superstring Theory. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is parallel reality. In the Superstring Theory, I think there are 11 separate realities that can co-exist at the same time. This island represents a co-created reality of all the characters that are on it.
The Superstring theory, used as a universal theory, is described by Michael D. Lemonick and J. Madeleine Nash as:
Based on the notion that, matter is made, not of particles, but of tiny, vibrating loops of energy called strings. The strings exist in a world of up to 10 spatial dimensions, all but three of which are too minute for us to perceive. Strange though it sounds, most physicists agree that it is the most likely candidate for the long-sought theory of everything that could finally unite relativity and quantum mechanics, the two great but mutually incompatible ideas of 20th century physics. (Cosmic Conundrum, Time Magazine)”
Okay the, so what does all this have to do with “crossings” and, in particular, those crossings concerning one Kate Austen, better known in our reality as Evangeline Lilly? Let me warn you the explanation you are about to read is long and filled with various quotes so if you feel that this might be a waste of your time stop now because there will be no forthcoming apologies.
Still here? Good.
Let’s begin by asking, which reality is real?
In our reality, the one you, the reader, and I, the writer, share, Evangeline Lilly is a television actress who got her first speaking role on television in our beloved series LOST. Prior to LOST she had been on only a few other television shows including guest appearances on Judgement Day, Smallville, Tru Calling, and Kingdom Hospital. Of those four shows only Smallville and Kingdom Hospital are noteworthy regarding any possible “crossings.” On Smallville our Kate may have crossed paths in the reality of a young Superman with deceased “ LOSTie” Boone Carlyle (aka Ian Somerhalder), who appeared multiple times as Adam Knight. But the show really worth looking at is Kingdom Hospital where Kate was simply a non-speaking patient known only as “Benson’s Girlfriends.” Here, Kate crosses paths with Dr. Stegman, played by Bruce Davison. Bruce Davison is better known to LOST fans as Dr. Brooks, Hurley’s care-taker at the Santa Rose Mental Health Institute in the episode entitled “Dave.”
The only things the Santa Rose Mental Health Institute and Kingdom Hospital have in common are that they’re both hospitals….oh, and some of the patients see people that may not be really there. The Kingdom Hospital is built on the site of mill used during the American Civil War where many children died in a fire. This tragedy is doomed to repeat itself through out history as the hospital is surrounded by the super natural energy of the event. However, what is most noteworthy about the Kingdom Hospital and its connection to LOST is its creator, Stephen “F’n” King (his real middle name is Edwin).
Anyone who considers themselves a fan of LOST knows the connection our reality’s Stephen King has with the LOST creators. He has even been mentioned quite frequently in connection with Others-leader, Ben Linus. Most recently, King’s book, The Gunslinger, appeared next to Ben when John Locke (the man who got me thinking about these crossings) entered his room in “The Man from Tallahassee.” Now, what is truly significant about this “crossing” is that while LOST producers admit the influence of Stephen King’s work on their show, it is in Kingdom Hospital that we see a more direct connection to the reality of his book The Gunslinger. According to Answers.com:
There are several references to some of King’s other works, including the Dark Tower series. The drink "Nozz-A-La", which Dr. Hook refers to as a "Nozzie" in one episode is a drink in the alternate reality The Stand takes place in and [the one] that Roland’s ka-tet comes across on their journey to the Dark Tower. However, at the end of the finale of the show, the Nozz-A-La machine has become a Pepsi machine (Kingdom Hospital, Answers.com).
This is a most startling discovery. For it leads me to the heart of what I believe each and every crossing is dealing with and I think is best summed up in a very long quote from Stephen King’s first book in the Dark Tower series, The Gunslinger. When the Gunslinger finally catches up with the Man in Black, the Man in Black begins:
The universe (he said) is the Great All, and offers a paradox too great for the finite mind to grasp. As the living brain cannot conceive of a non-living brain - although it may think it can - the finite mind cannot grasp the infinite.
The prosaic fact of the universe’s existence alone defeats both the pragmatic and the romantic. There was a time, yet a hundred generations before the world moved on, when mankind had achieved enough technical and scientific prowess to chip a few splinters from the great stone pillar of reality [emphasis mine]. Even so, the false light of science (knowledge, if you like) shone in only a few developed countries. One company (or cabal) led the way in this regard: North Central Positronics [ emphais mine, could this company, in LOST reality be the DHARMA intitiative? Perhaps the Hanso Foundation, or even Mittelos? Or a combination of the three?], it called itself. Yet, despite a tremendous increase in available facts, there were remarkably few insights.
"Gunslinger, our many-times-great grandfathers conquered the-disease-which-rots, which they called cancer, almost conquered aging, walked on the moon - "
"I don’t believe that," the gunslinger said flatly.
To this, the man in black merely smiled and answered, "You needn’t. Yet it was so. They made or discovered a hundred other marvelous baubles. But this wealth of infomation produced little or no insight. There were no great odes written to the wonders of artificial insemination - having babies from frozen mansperm [emphasis mine]– or to the cars that ran on power of the sun. Few if any seemed to have grasped the truest principle of reality: new knowledge leads to yet more awesome mysteries. Greater physiological knowledge of the brain makes the existence of the soul less possible yet more probable by the nature of the search. Do you see? Of course you don’t. You’ve reached the limits of your ability to comprehend. But nevermind - that’s beside the point."
"What is the point then?"
"The greatest mystery the universe offers is not life but size. Size encompasses life, and the Tower encompasses size [emphasis mine, could the island be something…more?]. The child, who is most at home with wonder, says: Daddy, what is above the sky? And the father says: The darkness of space. The child: What is beyond space? The father: The galaxy. The child: Beyond the galaxy? The father: Another galaxy. The child: Beyond the other galaxies? The father: No one knows.
"You see? Size defeats us. For the fish, the lake in which he lives is the universe. What does the fish think when he is jerked up by the mouth through the silver limits of existence and into a new universe where the air drowns him and the light is blue madness? Where huge bipeds with no gills stuff it into a suffocating box and cover it with wet weeds to die?
"Or one might take the tip of the pencil and magnify it. One reaches the point where a stunning realization strikes home: The pencil tip is not solid; it is composed of atoms which whirl and revolve like a trillion demon planets. What seems solid to us is actually only a loose net held together by gravity. Viewed at their actual size, the distances between these atoms might become league, gulfs, aeons. The atoms themselves are composed of nuclei and revolving protons and electrons. One may step down further to subatomic particles. And then to what? Tachyons? Nothing? Of course not. Everything in the universe denies nothing; to suggest an ending is the one absurdity.
"If you fell outward to the limit of the universe, would you find a board fence and signs reading DEAD END? No. You might find something hard and rounded, as the chick must see the egg from the inside. And if you should peck through the shell ( or find a door), [emphasis mine, perhaps even a hatch] what great and torrential light might shine through your opening at the end of space? Might you look through and discover our entire universe is but part of one atom on a blade of grass? Might you be forced to think that by burning a twig you incinerate an eternity of eternities? That existence rises not to one infinite but to an infinity of them?
"Perhaps you saw what place our universe plays in the scheme of things - as no more than an atom in a blade of grass. Could it be that everything we can perceive, from the microscopic virus to the distant Horsehead Nebula, is contained in one blade of grass that may have existed for only a single season in an alien time-flow? What if that blade should be cut off by a scythe? When it begins to die, would the rot seep into our universe and our own lives, turning everything yellow and brown and desiccated? Perhaps it’s already begun to happen. We say the world has moved on; maybe we really mean that it has begun to dry up.
"Think how small such a concept of things makes us, gunslinger! If a God watches over it all, does He actually mete out justice for such a race of gnats? Does His eye see the sparrow fall when the sparrow is less than a speck of hydrogen floating disconnected in the depth of space? And if He does see… what must the nature of such a God be? Where does He live? How is it possible to live beyond infinity? [emphasis mine, nothing particular to do with LOST, I just think it’s a damn good question]
"Imagine the sand of the Mohaine Desert, which you crossed to find me, and imagine a trillion universes - not worlds but universes [reconnecting the Superstring theory here]- encapsulated in each grain of that desert; and within each universe an infinity of others. We tower over these universes from our pitiful grass vantage point; with one swing of your boot you may knock a billion billion worlds flying off into darkness, a chain never to be completed.
"Size, gunslinger… size.
"Yet suppose further. Suppose that all worlds, all universes, met at a single nexus, a single pylon, a Tower. [emphasis mine, OR AN ISLAND?] And within it, a stairway, perhaps rising to the Godhead itself. Would you dare climb to the top, gunslinger? Could it be that somewhere above all of endless reality, there exists a room? [emphasis mine, or again, a hatch?]
"You dare not."
Do you dare? Or does Jack or Locke dare? Is it possible, that as much as when Stephen King wrote the Dark Tower series, the creators of LOST did not create a mere television show but stumbled upon an ultimate reality? Perhaps they stumbled upon a reality in which the nexus of all realities exists and in these “crossings” they “create” and the “crossings” that simply seem coincidental in our world (i.e. like actors from one show appearing as different characters together in another show, see my articles Crossing Mr. Locke and Crossings Exposed) are actually signs that indicate which reality is the nexus. Is it mine and yours or is it Jack and Locke’s?
Does this possibility help Doc Arzt’s theory about the significance of episode 3.14, “ExposÄ—” seem even more valid (i.e. a television show within a television show that gives clues about that television show…is your nose bleeding from the brain hemorrhage yet)? Join me next week as we explore the further mysteries of these and other crossings.
Works Cited
"Kingdom Hospital." Wikipedia. Wikipedia, 2007. Answers.com 01 Apr. 2007. http://www.answers.com/topic/kingdom-hospital
Cosmic Conundrum. 22, Nov. 2004. Time Magazine. 1, April 2007.









I subscribe to this kind of theory. When this site held that final episode contest thing last year, the one I submitted pretty much dealt with everything in this article.
It’d be cool if it actually happened, but…
Comment by mike — April 9, 2007 @ 11:07 am
Dude, you’re way too hung up on this “crossings” business. Fact is, there are a lot of established television actors out there who appear on a lot of different television shows. Some of them are bound to cross paths with others. I love Lost. I think it’s the best show on television. I love Stephen King. But to suggest that all these different TV shows and the works of Stephen King have all existed to come together and become the meaning of the mysteries behind Lost is just a bit much. I don’t think King or the producers of Lost or the producers of all those other shows you mentioned had some grand plan in mind that is coming to fruition in Lost. I used to love the whole “Lost theory machine,” but it seems the more the producers reveal that the answers to the show aren’t going to be some ridiculously difficult to explain revelation, the farther you people reach for the answers. Let’s come back to reality and focus more on just this show. The producers like Stephen King, so they make Stephen King references. The end. Television actors cross paths a lot coincidentally. That’s it.
Comment by Jared — April 9, 2007 @ 11:23 am
Actually, I like the connection between King’s Tower series and Lost, and I think there are some cool similarities between the two, however, if you’ve read the DT then you’d know that King already specifies “the nexus of all worlds” in our world, and it’s not a tower or an island. It’s a rose.
Comment by Andrew — April 9, 2007 @ 12:05 pm
What if it’s not quite as complex as “crossings”, but rather just interesting how the various characters’ back-stories allow for multiple genres and styles to be worked into the show, and how this allots for the writers to both pay homage to their pop cultural influences as well as make genre conventions malleable, coupled w/ the fact that a lot of character actors tend to play the same types of roles over and over again?
Don’t get me wrong, this is all interesting, but it’s not likely to amount to much beyond “oh, this bit is like such-and-such part in Watchmen w/ the exception that…” or whatever in fan discussion. Copyright and IP laws are so nutty these days that anything overtly direct results in the risk of serious litigation.
OTOH, if there has to be some sort of parallel between thematic elements of Lost and The Dark Tower, though, I hope this is more on the mark. It’d be awful to have an incredibly cliched “loop-back” ending. But gawrsh, that’s something the producer’s haven’t discredited…
Comment by Richard Lennox — April 9, 2007 @ 12:16 pm
You must study physics… I agree that string theory is mathematically the most complete theory that explains the physical world. But the hidden dimensions are hidden dimensions and cannot explain coexistent worlds, but only some more dimensions of the same world… all the dimensions are interlinked they are not a parted from each other. If you want separated dimensions you must look for another theory not string.
Comment by ruit — April 9, 2007 @ 12:41 pm
Or what about that time when Barnard and the US Marshal showed up on Malcom in the Middle as a city councilman and a cop. Freaking cosmic…
Comment by Charlie Lesoine — April 9, 2007 @ 1:06 pm
Just one thing, Stephen King didn’t invent Kingdom Hospital…
As you are aware it was an adaptation (and a really bad one at that) of Lars von Trier’s The Kingdom (”Riget”), co-written by T
Comment by Ian — April 9, 2007 @ 1:23 pm
Oh, and the rest of your theory is rubbish as well. As others have pointed out, the other dimensions in string theory are not multiverses, though they could potentially connect them. Please give up on the “crossings” obsession as well - it’s getting tired and boring. I suggest you read up on Discordianism more as that’s got a lot more to do with Lost than what you are waffling on about.
Comment by Ian — April 9, 2007 @ 1:28 pm
There are some parts of this “theory” (notice I used quotes, ask yourself why I used quotes, if you don’t understand why I used quotes then you really need to stop reading my articles. There’s an ongoing theme here and it has to do with planting your tongue firmly in your cheek) that I really hope play out. I’d love to see Dharma/Mittelos/Hanso as an early version of the North Central Positronics. I’d love to find out that the Island is “Darlton’s” (credit Doc) Tower. Would I be upset with the finale being Jack dying and opening his eyes and we’re back at the Pilot? Not at all. However, I don’t think TPTB had any more intention of creating the amalgamation of pop-culture other than to layer their own story and pay homage to those who came before. I don’t think there is a universal, supernatural conspiracy involving the show. But what if there was….?
Comment by Merlboroman — April 9, 2007 @ 2:19 pm
Lost is fiction not science. The string theory possibly explains the physical nature of this world, but does not give the rosetta stone for figuring out the world of lost.
You might be making a little too much out of external “crossings.” And, the additional allusions to other works are only tangentially related to the mythology of Lost.
The value in the episode Expose may only show us the power that Locke and/or Hurly have to affect changes in Lost reality with the help of the island.
Comment by TabulaRasa — April 9, 2007 @ 2:19 pm
But what if there was….?
Then I’d like to see elements of the Cthulhu mythos and the Kasper Hauser legend integrated into this meta-whasis, w/ messages sent via W.A.S.T.E. for good measure!
Comment by Richard Lennox — April 9, 2007 @ 3:04 pm
Doc Artz you amaze me. Why don’t you have more commercial success.
To all of you: I don’t think you get what the Doc-man is doing. When I theorize about LOST I’m not preoccupied with whether or not I’m correct. Im exercising my mind. Many people don’t understand this. LOST has shown us that television is the next source of intellectualism, the way books and song have been. These stories allow us to think about crazy possibilities, new ideas, and open our minds. I mean I doubt the Docster really believes this is what the show will turn out to be. Instead he is giving us an intellectual jog. Often I have wondered if all the stories in books might in fact exist in some alternate universe. What Doc A is doing is showing us how that could work. I applaud his inventiveness and ideas. Please continue Docinator, oh and sorry for the nicknames.
Comment by Jalocke — April 9, 2007 @ 3:10 pm
Doc obviously didnt write this, Jalocke.
Comment by Jimmy Zer0 — April 9, 2007 @ 3:27 pm
Ooops…. that is my fault. While I left Merl’s by-line in at the top, I forgot to switch his name is as poster. Sorry for the confusion.
Comment by docarzt — April 9, 2007 @ 4:18 pm
While this was written by Mel (not Doc) I’d have to agree 100% with Jalocke. This is all about brain stimulation and the evolution of man (which is part of my big theory, but that’s for another day). I’m still amazed that after Mel warns people to not read any further if this is not for them that we still have the good old haters showing up. GIVE IT A REST ALREADY!
Mel, this (part III) completely validates your “crossings” subject. I love it. This is one of the most thought provoking ideas I’ve heard on here. Well done. The easter eggs that are “The Dark Tower” and Stephen Hawkings “Black Hole (more to title that escapes me)” are much more than just props. It would not surprise me one bit if this were a part of the LOST world when all is said and done. “Suppose all worlds, all universes met at a single nexus, a single pylon, a tower [emphasis mine, OR AN ISLAND]. To all you nay-sayers, have a Guinness because this is f’n BRILLIANT…
Comment by cap10tripps — April 9, 2007 @ 4:45 pm
Seriously……..if you like this type of stuff CHECK OUT “egoplex.com”!!!! This is not a shamless self promotion, I am just a big fan of the therories on the site.
I also really liked above article. It has allot of paralles with this: http://www.egoplex.com/2006/10/fission-and-fusion-lost-and-cosmogonic.html
I hope the writters and producers are headed in this direction!!!
Comment by spindles — April 9, 2007 @ 6:36 pm
Merl, your theory is fascinating. I don’t understand the people who think that you’re being totally serious that this is exactly what’s going on. I like that you’re stretching the thought boundaries…for if Lost isn’t made for musing, what is it for?
Comment by ParkwaySouth — April 9, 2007 @ 7:31 pm
You have to wonder how much of the time travel stuff is just background? One of my theories goes like this: the island is host to a trapped fluctuation of creation energy. This creation energy could best be described as pure potential. It is as capable of creating an 11 dimensional construct as it is resurrecting the dead. The thing with potential without purpose is it can do anything without consequence to its existence. In other words, the ability to connect to an alternate universe, or time-line, derived from the potential force, doesn’t need to be part of ‘raw potentials’ purpose, merely something that can happen in a field of infinite possibilities. The kicker is, no matter how strangely this force manifests or behaves with regards to peoples health, time, space, etc, it is only the fact that it has this nature that is important to the story. In the end game of the show, the forces behavior, or past actions, could be of little consequence. We’ve seen this done in similar stories. Star Wars being the most prominent. The difference is, if no-one in star wars knew that the force existed, and all of sudden were able to use its powers, extend their existence beyond death, time, and space, we’d have a very similar level of weirdness… but it’d still be about blowing up the death star.
Comment by docarzt — April 9, 2007 @ 8:07 pm
I like the thought here Doc. It’s kind of like Stem Cells for the universe. This energy can be whatever it is “willed” to be and therefore no one knows exactly how it works. I think Flannery O’Connors “The Third Policeman” is worth a look. If you’ve read that book then you’ll know that in the underground area there existed a machine (perhaps a box) that could create anything you could imagine, but once you took it to the surface it turned to ash. This is why Locke knows he can’t leave the island. Also, I think Sawyer rereading “Watership Down” isn’t merely coincidence. The whole story arc of being captured by the Others, escaping with help from one their own, one of them returning with the escapees…it’s all very reminiscent of Watership Down. Which brings me back to something…
If Lost were THE great revelation of the meaning behind nearly every shared literary myth in the last century, what would it reveal? Why would it be revealed now? hmmmmm
Comment by Merlboroman — April 9, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
Im thinking all the Losties are in a Matrix style reality, they are really in a DHAMA Lab somewhere hooked up to tubes and there minds are linked to each other in a fabric formed by both there own imagination and the direction of the Dhama implants (Others).
“Smokie” is actually the ‘real’ world interacting with the subjects, and scanning there thoughts.
The subject of the testing involves unstable people who are going through a series of tests to see if under different circumstanses, would repeat there actions.
Basicly they all have responsibility problems ie:
Jack- with betrayal
Kate- with commitment
Saywer- with responsibility for his actions
Charlie- Drugs
Echo- death of his brother
Locke- his father
Clair- her Family
Hurley- Numbers
Sayid- Trust
The only way out of this reality, is to confront and overcome this fear, they then will be removed from this program, without letting the Losties aware of it ie:
Old mate doing anything he had to do, to get his boy back.
Charlie giving up the drugs, he is healed and will be killed off.
Echo confronting his brother, and achieving salvation.
But Desmond came out of the test by himself, and was then put back under, but something happened to him on the outside that alerted the watchers in the snow, to the whereabouts of the testing facilty. He now cannot fathom the so called reality of the island, and is getting not flashbacks, but images of the programs being installed.
Locke also has, i think started to understand what he needs to do to get out, and has relised the ‘Others’ are cheating by pushing them into situations, so they are leaving them to fend for themselves with just one watcher.
Juliet needs to get closer to the Losties, and monitor there well being, and is using Jack, and Kate to get there.
She is the key, for Kate, Sayid, and Jack.
Comment by Shano — April 9, 2007 @ 8:49 pm
Fantastic post from a strong imagination. You remind me of why I love the Dark Tower series so much.
Keep it up–I love your ‘crossings’ posts.
Comment by Lance — April 9, 2007 @ 9:46 pm
I don’t mean to “miss the point” of this whole thing, but I must voice my HOPES that this theory is incorrect for a few reasons.
Yes, I am one of those viewers who wants the show to go a conventional, science fact sort of direction (I can deal with SMOKIE being nanobots, I love Michael Crichton), but that’s not my main reasoning.
While I appreciate the string theory (and King as a whole) I personally want to see the writers… well… write. I know the string theory is not exactly old hat, but I’d like to see LOST go a brand new direction, something that, in the end, NO ONE will be able to sit back and say “Hey, that was just like the book/movie/show/epic poem _______”.
The crossings thing is impressively thought out, and I understand the whole mental excercise bit, but I just hope that this is not the way the writers choose to go.
Comment by evangelical poet — April 9, 2007 @ 11:26 pm
The wonderful thing about the show is that all of us from our different perspectives can take something from our beliefs and insert it into the mythology of the show. There are references to other works so the producers and writers are obviously well versed. And, since it is fiction that may or may not be based on science, it challenges our imagination. It is wonderful to engage in “what if…”
Merl, great effort in your theory. I did not mean to slight it in the least. My fear is, if you take your theory to it’s logical conclusion, then the end of Lost will be like the end of Blazing Saddles.
Comment by TabulaRasa — April 10, 2007 @ 5:36 am
While I certainly don’t subscribe to the idea that *Lost* is, in truth, an alternate reality, it does seem plausible that in the fictional world, the island represents this sort of nexus that King builds in *Dark Tower*. We do know that Desmond has been able to move between realities - and that those realities have been connected - and the producers hint that what happened to Desmond may, in fact, be a clue to other flashbacks (the implication being that the island is a means of correcting previous mistakes). The producers have heavily drawn on the Dark Tower series (something I noticed in Season 1, and of which I became firmly convinced in Season 2), and may be telling another version of King’s masterpiece. Way to get us thinking!
Comment by Walter — April 10, 2007 @ 6:04 am
The main character in SK’s “Talisman” travels to a parallel world called “the territories”. His name - Jack Sawyer. I guess another coincidence.
Comment by Sam — April 10, 2007 @ 8:56 am
When LOST began the first thing we saw was Jack’s eye looking up from where he was lying after the crash. The nexus is Jack… always has been.
Comment by The Man from Nowhere — April 10, 2007 @ 10:43 am
Another interesting Dark Tower/Lost tidbit: Remember the Wolves of The Calla? Some things immediately come to mind: WARNING: DARK TOWER SPOILERS AHEAD!
1. The Wolves came and took the children in the night.
2. We find out in the last book that the children were taken so they could be used to feed the psychic breakers by the Low Men, who thought of themselves as doing the right thing by destroying the Tower.
3. The psychic breakers were recruited from our world and then taken to the land of Fedic via a dimensional door. It was very much like Juliet’s recruitment via Not In Portland. Fedic was a manufactured experience ( the sun was a light beam from the sky), and the people there were held pseudo-captive by the Crimson King’s men. Also, it caused problems for the people there (skin lesions, etc.) - Sound similar to our losties and what’s happening to the women?
It’s becoming quite clear that Lost does indeed owe a lot to The Dark Tower series. Excellent post Merlboroman. Even if it’s not true, it is a very interesting theory.
Comment by GodBlessTexas — April 10, 2007 @ 10:46 am
Tabula, I think your criticism is not lumped in with someone who simply says this is rubbish. There is nothing wrong with a bit of constructive criticism as long as its done with some thought and backup. I for one was a little confused with Mel’s first two “crossings” (although still interested). This third installment has brought it to levels that I am absolutely trying to reach within the LOST universe. Again, well done Mel…
Comment by cap10tripps — April 10, 2007 @ 12:10 pm
Nice theory Merlboroman, but dude… you get way too into this. I bet you a quid to a bog brush that this whole thing is no where near as involved with time travel and alternate universes as a lot of people are making out. I like to think I think outside the box but a lot of people theorising here have completely lost sight of the box (and that’s not reference to ‘the magic box’!) I love the fact that this show has spurred so much interest but it’s a show, that’s all. The writers probably weren’t even starting possibly considering thinking of writing lost when Stephen King and Lars von Trier were writing/filming their shows/books.
Comment by Ben's Wheelchair — April 11, 2007 @ 3:30 am
Nice theory Merlboroman, but dude… you get way too into this. I bet you a quid to a bog brush that this whole thing is no where near as involved with time travel and alternate universes as a lot of people are making out. I like to think I think outside the box but a lot of people theorising here have completely lost sight of the box (and that’s not reference to ‘the magic box’!) I love the fact that this show has spurred so much interest but it’s a show, that’s all. The writers probably weren’t even starting possibly considering thinking of writing lost when Stephen King and Lars von Trier were writing/filming their shows/books.
Comment by Ben's Wheelchair — April 11, 2007 @ 3:30 am
The above post is brought to you by someone who didn’t read the other comments before posting his own.
Just hacking on you Ben. However, if you pay real close attention you’ll see that either I’m certifiable or I’m full of ****. Which one do you think it is?
Comment by Merlboroman — April 11, 2007 @ 1:12 pm
To all of those who believe that LOST has nothing to do with time bending or alternate universes, have you been watching the show that airs at 10pm on Wednesday nights? Desmond’s flashes, purple sky, Smokey, Locke’s dad being pulled from a “box,” 70 year old wombs on 26 year old women, I could go on and on. This show has been way outside the box (but still within reason) since its inception. It forces you to note the unanswered possibilities of the universe. Even if it all turns out to be a dream or brain implants or anything that seems more tangible to the early 21st century mind, it will still have had something to do with the things we can’t quite grasp. They are right there staring at you in the face. Ben’s Wheelchair, I don’t mean to single you out (a lot of people share your beliefs). You have said it without telling Merl he sucks or calling out Doc’s written grammar (or any other pointless waste of space), so kudos to you on decent criticism. I mean no offense when I also let you know that Bush is one of the worst presidents in U.S. history, and this Iraqi war has everything to do with oil fields. My point is that these are things that stare us in the face, but our conscious mind will not allow you to think that way. LOST is about expanding the mind the way nothing on our televisions ever has before…
Comment by cap10tripps — April 11, 2007 @ 2:18 pm
It’s a small industry. Actors always end up crossing paths. The weird thing would be if it never happened.
Don’t mistake coincidence for fate.
Comment by Adam — April 14, 2007 @ 2:55 pm