Doc’s Lost Interview Reflections
A few of you were dismayed that I did not attempt to get answers to the mysteries of the show from Damon and Carlton. I don’t want to spark a debate about the rightness or wrongness of that point of view but what I will say is this: the best possible experience you can have receiving those answers is seeing them unfold on the show with absolutely no warning that they are coming. Period. I know this for a fact, because I have lived on all sides of the fan experience. Let me go way back to explain.
It might surprise you guys to know that I was not a LOST fan from the beginning. In fact, I disregarded it as some Castaway/Survivor knock-off; a typical network cookie-cutter creation. So I resisted the water cooler overtures to join the in-crowd, and instead maintained my ‘closed-circuit’ viewing habits of purchased movies and classic series box sets. To be precise, I was as anti-network television as anyone could be, I’d been burned by hype once too often. Then somebody said the magic words "Twilight Zone". Regardless of the hype, you do not compare something to "Twilight Zone" without it getting a complimentary viewing followed by a diatribe on the declination of story telling. So I acquired the first couple of episodes, sat down to watch them, and the rest is history.
What made this experience great for me is that I had sheltered myself from the very beginning. I had very little knowledge about the show. Something about a monster. That was about it. At this point, LOST was at episode 15. I acquired enough episodes to get caught up and was completely transfixed for two days. I came to LOST with my own Tabula Rasa, no pondering the pace of the plot, no concerns over whether any interviewer had challenged the writers with specific questions, no theories, no spoilers, it was just me and the show.
As time went by, and I settled into the week-to-week patterns of watching the show, I maintained my insulation from the media. I didn’t want to know what was going to happen. I was addicted to the surprise. There were things I was dying to know, but terrified to ask. The first time someone mentioned spoilers at work and blew the next episodes high-mark, I lost it. Then, season one ended and I discovered an entirely new culture of TV viewers. People who were plugged into the internet iv, getting information on a constant drip. They surfed, they scanned, they googled. They read any interview, article, theory in the mainstream. They argued with each other like noble warriors defending fragile little continents of thought.
It only got worse as the second season came around and the mythology began to thicken and flow from eclectic sources. The chase was on, and at this time I’d become addicted not to getting the information, but providing it. And then, I discovered yet another culture of being altogether, the ones who have the imperative of the first, the absolute need in their existence to be the one with the answer, to beat the pack, to be regarded as the "guru". And so I played that game, and if you’re here now you probably know I did it well for quite some time.
Despite understanding how this works, psychologically, I still covet that first state of being the most. The one who approaches every episode of LOST with an uninformed sense of wonder. Not the slightest clue WHAT will happen, but the certainty that something WILL. I miss being that person because, frankly, that guy was a better fan than any of the other factions that have evolved in this crazy ‘fan’ community. Allowing the desire to know the story to erode your reason to the point where you think that having the information ‘given’ to you is as satisfying as having it revealed
as it was intended, in the flowing narrative of the story, on the show.
So, in the end, I don’t apologize for not pushing Damon and Carlton for "answers". If anything, I apologize for feeding the community that has somehow lost touch with the simple concepts of how to enjoy a television show. The prerequisite is, you have to want the show to tell the story. If you want to hear it in bits of interviews, spoilers, and disgruntled actors rants in foreign publications (!), you are missing the point.
Now, don’t worry. This doesn’t mark a huge paradigm shift in what TheTailsection is going to be. In fact, I have a couple of contributors coming on board that I am extremely excited about who are going to contribute to returning TheTailsection to being what it was at its peak, a site for current news and thoughtful (hopefully) commentary on what is transpiring in the shows past, present, and future. It’s an exciting time for sure. But I worry about those of you who are angry that the opportunity to interview Damon and Carlton did not yield "answers". In fact, it did explain many things that were important to a number of people. The fact that it did not further your understanding of LOST’s mysteries is a win, as far as I’m concerned. Let’s allow these men to tell their story the way they want to tell it, not by throwing nuggets of information to petulant ‘fans’, but by continuing to do what they been doing since he very beginning.









So what your saying Doc, is we should all stop visiting your site? JUST KIDDING! Seriously though, that is very idealistic and all but anybody who is in this deep isn’t getting out of the water, if you catch my drift.
Comment by joe — March 8, 2007 @ 4:23 pm
Ah, to attain such enlightenment … I actually come to sites like these because LOST has strung out so many confusing plotlines that I can’t even keep them straight any more. So, I’m not really looking for spoilers so much as a plotline. As I said elsewhere, I would have like to see them put to rest a couple of the minor storylines that won’t be continued.
Comment by Bob — March 8, 2007 @ 4:28 pm
Doc,
I thought your interview was insightful. It was an interview by someone who obviously gets the show on so many different fronts. Their answers were equally respectful, and definitely more giving that I read int he Lost Mag or in their podcasts. Instead of actual answers they could give, I’d rather see it revealed on the show.
I too miss the days of being a fan who watched but didn’t delve. But really this is a show you can delve into. They WANT you to. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t put out the literary references, the name references not to mention the visual ones too. It’s called depth. I an probably say LOST is one of the most if not the most detailed show with more references to almost every nuance than any other show before it.
I also think this site is fine. I haven’t noticed that much flux between what “your glory days” were and now. It’s been pretty steady with content, even though the content has changed. This is one of 2 sites I regularly visit, so I am all good with it.
Comment by downthehatch — March 8, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
If I didn’t come onto these fansites I would have stopped watching a long time ago.
As a show it’s gone down the tubes. As a puzzle it remains intriguing as ever.
Comment by JoshSpazJosh — March 8, 2007 @ 4:52 pm
They wouldn’t have answered the big questions anyway. You asked the questions you knew were most likely to be answered and you even brought to the table some questions that they may not have expected. I’m glad you didn’t waste their time and ours by asking the obvious questions.
I like the spoilers and I like knowing what will happen because I get more time to digest the info. I still get surprised because it never happens the way I picture it. It’s like reading the Cliff’s notes and then reading the entire book. Important themes pop out initially in the spoilers, but the actual episodes hold the precious details.
Besides we know the good spoilers aren’t going to come from the producers unless they want us to know, and if they want us to know something they aren’t going to wait around for someone to ask.
Comment by Megan — March 8, 2007 @ 7:26 pm
Doc, this may be the booze talking but if someone told me tomorrow how this show would end, I would still watch it every week, twice a week….
Unlike you, I watched from the get go and was hooked…Charlie delivered the line that hooked me “Where are we?”..even though he’s my least fave character, he did his part and hooked me like a big old fish….
That being said, this site, your interviews and insight and the fact that you are bringing on some hard core theorists gets my blood pumping….I look forward to the lively debates and the name calling….I’m in til the end, brother….
Comment by El Prez — March 8, 2007 @ 8:19 pm
The interview was nice. It did answer some questions. Could it be better if it was more spoilerish? Maybe so, but it was nice still. Congratz Doc.
Comment by Ed — March 9, 2007 @ 3:34 am
Doc,
I thought your questions were pefect! You asked questions that others haven’t. Very well done.
Well, that Twin question was for you…. but we’ll give you a pass on that one. I’d have asked a question about my own theory as well. I’m actually glad you asked it.. because it killed the Twin theory.. and probably the clone theory, which I’ve always thought had no logical background, but the boat, Candle/Wickman and BAD TWIN.
Comment by Tom T — March 9, 2007 @ 3:36 am
I came to Lost much the same way. I did not watch the first season at all. I saw a few minutes of the season 1 finale and thought that it looked interesting so I acquired the rest of season 1 from Bit Torrent and watched it for 2 days straight. Then I gave the videos to my brother who also watched it for 2 days straight.
By the time season 2 came along I was totally hooked.
And a big thank you to ABC for showing the shows on their website for free so I don’t need to use BitTorrent anymore.
Comment by Eric — March 9, 2007 @ 5:25 am
Doc, call me a skeptic, but common sense tells me Damon and Carlton already read your questions before hand or told you what they would answer and what they wouldn’t.
Come one folks, get a grip, smell the coffe do you REALLY think the producers of this show would sit down with ANYONE and reveal ANYTHING of ANY signifigance to the endgame of this show?????? Give me a break!
It was opportunity of PR to pacify one the premier blog writers of the show becuase they know Doc has thousands of readers who come to this site to keep the HYPE alive.
Look at the thread of DOC asking people what questions they wanted asked. It is one of the biggest threads on this website. And to think of 120+ replies, all DOC asked were 15 lame questions that I don’t even remember anyone really suggesting……(maybe they did I just don’t remember skimming across them)
My gut tells me the interview was set before the first sound was uttered.
I still like the show, I still love the blog, but I am SO over the producers hype and dodgeball game.
My one suggestion KEEP IT REAL and BELIEVABLE, cause right now this show is getting way out there in SCI-FI world and I am not DIGGING that!
Comment by thirdflr — March 9, 2007 @ 5:59 am
Heh… thirdflr, that is about as cynical as it can get
No they didn’t arrange in advance. As for the suggested questions, I had to stick with what I thought was going to be answered, a few did make it in such as whether we’d get more info on candle/radzinsky. Some were redundant with questions I already had down, such as the LOST experience. Believe me, with as busy as these guys are right now, they wouldn’t have had time to structure their answers. I was luck to get the 15 minutes.
Comment by docarzt — March 9, 2007 @ 6:07 am
Doc,
I thought you did a great job with the interview, esp your question about whether there is enough revealed on the show in order for one to come up with an accurate fact-based theory about the show. I had the same experience you did w/ watching the show insulated from the media/hype, except I did it with the first two seasons + 6 eps of season 3! Not in Portland is the first ep I ever watched as it aired. It was a lot of fun captivated by the DVDs for two weekends straight. Keep up the good work . . .
Comment by Kev — March 9, 2007 @ 6:18 am
Doc,
You have to stop being so defensive and responding to anything negative that is being said. It’s like you have to have an answer for everything. It’s not necessary. Just let us talk and say what we want. No one is trying to undermine you, we’re stating opinions. Like to this, I am sure you are going to respond with some long witty response. It’s not necessary, you do not have to have an answer for everything - we are all just talking here.
Comment by Ed — March 9, 2007 @ 6:28 am
Personally I liked your interview and have always appreciated your analysis to not be upset with the amount of questions a particular episode or interview offers. In fact I too came to Lost in much the same way, and up until that despised network tv. Also, I have always have maintained your approach that Lost is a serialized story meaning that certain episodes need to occur for the purpose of the story, and though they may not always be my favorite I enjoy them because I am engrossed in the story. I do not care whether Lost supposedly jumps the proverbial shark, or if they didn’t beat Criminal Minds this week in ratings. The only time I care about ratings is if the show were actually in danger of being canceled. However, Lost has never even approached that danger, and I doubt it ever will. So I find it very disconcerting when the media and fans alike go crazy about questions like “Has Lost lost it?” I say enjoy the story you bought the ticket from the first iris shot as Jack wakes up in the jungle, now enjoy the ride. Sure it’s ok to critique episodes and ask questions about where certain character arcs are going, but Lost has given us enough quality entertainment and thoughtful plot development that I think it’s a bit premature to ask if writer have lost their creative juices until we see where the show finally ends up. Anyway, sorry for the lengthy rant, Doc you the man, enjoy the show.
Comment by Ian — March 9, 2007 @ 6:45 am
Same here, Doc. I didn’t even know about the show untill the end of the 1st season. I read Entertainment Weekly, and the best part of the mag , for me, if Steven King’s writing in the back of it. He spoke very highly of Lost, and i’m a big steven king fan, so if it wasnt for his praise about the show, I wouldn’t have tuned it. But i figured if Steve is watchin it, and loving it, then its good enough for me. So BIG thanks to Steven King, u are the man!
Comment by Jimyy — March 9, 2007 @ 8:06 am
Hey Ed, if we’re all just talking here, why can’t Doc defend his actions? A lot of people attacked his approach. Personally I’d like to hear what he has to say about the details that led him to ask the questions he did.
I don’t think that was a witty or long response but I’m not Doc…I’m just a talker..
If we really want to get to the bottom of a mystery, I’m convinced that 3rdfloor is really Doc in disguise. I’ve never seen two more opposing views. It seems like a BAD TWIN set up……Maybe someone should interview Doc about the blog and ask him a twin question….Life imitating art…:)
Comment by El Prez — March 9, 2007 @ 8:41 am
I was really pleased to read Doc’s comments on the virtues of watching the show unfold as you watch it. Creating this experience is part of the craft of every author, whether it be TV, film or novel. I enjoy this site for documenting, researching and clarifying the details that have been revealed, and for the discussion and speculation.
Some folks clearly like the spoilers; here’s hoping that they will continue to keep spoilers separate and mark them with warnings.
I hope that the show’s writers will try to keep the basics as believable as possible. For example, I found it disappointing that, in “Enter 77″, Locke entered the code without discussion. This is the same guy who was so sure he was right about the Swan that he let the 108 minutes lapse without entering the numbers … with disastrous consequences. You’d think his experience might have taught him something. (Unless it’s his destiny to blow up all things DHARMA, and destiny trumps experience.) And I suppose that we’re also expected to believe that he allows himself to be so distracted by the computer that he doesn’t constantly check on his captive, even though he knows that there is another ‘other’ nearby, and that Mikhail can, Hannibal Lechter-like, silently escape from bonds tied by a professional (Sayid) and sneak up behind Locke. It wouldn’t have been hard to make it a little more believable …suppose, for example, that Locke heard the sounds of the struggle coming from the basement - now THAT would be a good distraction, and as he goes to investigate, Mikhail, who was apparently unconscious…well, you get the idea.
Wonder what happened to the horse?
Comment by Mike B. — March 9, 2007 @ 11:42 am
thrdflr, Not digging Science Fiction? Dude, go watch Something About Brian, or Friends or some sh!t like that. The Science Fiction aspect is what makes Lost so intriguing. Not if Hurley is good at ping-pong or who’s the father of Sun’s baby - Unless it’s the smoke monster’s.
Comment by Sarah — March 9, 2007 @ 4:11 pm
Congtats on the interview, Doc. I’m so thrilled you were given the opportunity to bring it to the fans. Great job!
Comment by stephsmith — March 10, 2007 @ 2:41 am
(Response to Sarah 3/9: I asked “try to keep the basics as believable as possible”…that was not a request to reduce the sci-fi content or to increase the “human-interest” storylines; it just means, please make the characters’ actions consistent and believable within the context of the overall Lost universe. I gave a specific example in my posting.)
Comment by Mike B. — March 11, 2007 @ 7:07 am
Lol.. I am not 3rdfloor
Comment by docarzt — March 12, 2007 @ 6:32 pm
Lol.. I am not 3rdfloor
Comment by docarzt — March 12, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
bank cards chase
Comment by website chase bank — April 9, 2007 @ 10:57 pm
online courses defensive driving
Comment by defensive online delaware driving — May 13, 2007 @ 7:55 pm